Words of Hate

This article demonstrates the absolute degradation of the English language.

So, let's be clear: Hillary Clinton does not deserve to be called a cunt. You may not like her politics, nor may you appreciate her public persona. (In the interests of disclosure, I do not like her politics, but I actually like her persona. I've said repeatedly that I want her to stay in the senate. I believe that's where she will stay and she can provide enormous support to a President Obama, and enormous counter balance to a President McCain.) And while I'm sure there are people in the world that Ms. Clinton hates, after being a target of the media and suffering the greatest personal humiliation any woman has ever suffered, who could blame her?

The only public person I can think of who would come close to qualify as a cunt would be Ann Coulter. It's unfortunate for the purposes of this post that Ms. Coulter is also, allegedly, a female. Long, flowing blonde hair notwithstanding, I have seen no actual evidence of that fact. Men can be cunts too, and actually quite frequently are more brilliant cunts than women could ever be. (Again, in the interests of clarification, Adolf Hitler is not a cunt. There is not a word sufficient in the English language to describe him. The frequently used term 'monster' casts him with a pastel light of a bed-time story, which I think is generally agreed inappropriate.)

No, Miss Coulter qualifies as a cunt because her entire reason for existence is to spew hatred, divide people and promote herself. She is a symptomatic display of the ugly parts of this country with virtually no discernable redeeming quality. And virtually every time she is on the television screen she deserves to be called a cunt.

That is the difference and the inappropriate use of the term to describe Ms. Clinton not only demonstrates the level of thinking in Roger Stone, but also demonstrates that for the conserative agenda there is nothing sacred.